Paper#3 vs. Paper#2 Reflection

Paper #3 is rightfully considered more difficult than Paper #2.  Paper #2 was an analysis of related ads, whereas Paper #3 was  a position paper.  Paper #2 was relatively straight forward; pick three related ads analyze and compare.  For Paper #2 we had a list of questions that we could use for every ad and then we had to compare and contrast them.  Basically the same thing three times over and a conclusion.  Paper #3 on the other hand was a whole other kettle of fish.  In Paper #3 we had a bunch of different details and components that we had to include, all supporting our singular position.  Paper #3 required evidence and counterarguments.  Paper #3 was thus more complicated than Paper #2, requiring more attention and individually contemplated components.  Whereas Paper #2 had a certain amount of overlap among the three body paragraphs.  While Paper #2 had a straight forward format, (at least the way I wrote it), intro, one body paragraph per ad, and a conclusion, Paper #3 on the other hand was more flexible.  Paper #3 had an indeterminate number of body paragraphs, at least partially due to an indeterminate quantity of evidence gathered, counterarguments, and length and detail of each.  As you should now see Paper #3 was notably more complicated than Paper #2 as it required a more in-depth composition.